Write For Us!

Opinions, Analysis, and Rebuttals.

Home Blog Page 6

Gender Balance: The Universal Case of Gender Equity

0
Gender Equity

Envision a society in which the majority of people are deprived of the chance to realize their complete potential. Welcome to the world of gender inequality, where prejudices and outmoded norms keep us behind.

Before going further into details, let’s uncover the difference between gender equality and gender equity. Gender equality refers to equal opportunities and treatment for men and women, regardless of their gender. Gender equity focuses on addressing systemic inequalities. It involves providing what is fair. Gender equality would give the same size shoe to everyone regardless of their foot size, but gender equity would provide shoes that fit each person’s foot by recognizing their differences.

Men and women are physiologically, biologically, socially, and emotionally different. They have different roles and different needs. They should be dealt with in the same way. Gender equity provides that if a woman is a PHD scholar and a man is only a high school graduate, there shouldn’t be any biases based on gender while giving the job.

Gender equality would give the same size shoe to everyone regardless of their foot size, but gender equity would provide shoes that fit each person’s foot by recognizing their differences.

Women with higher qualifications should get the job, and vice versa. There shouldn’t be any prejudice against any gender. They should be paid according to their working hours. There are some jobs at which men are great, and there are some things at which women are great. They should be assigned work according to their capabilities.

Gender mainstreaming was a concept introduced at the 1985 Nairobi World Conference on Women. It was an approach to policymaking that took into account the concerns of both men and women. It involved identifying the different needs of men and women because they are different and making policies accordingly. It was a crucial step to accelerate gender equity in the world.

In ancient times, women who were considered to be outspoken or possessed knowledge of herbalism were targeted and accused of witchcraft. This is a stark example of how prejudiced our world is. Women were considered to be inferior. They were not given the right to vote until the dawn of the 20th century. Women were considered to be emotionally weak; that’s why it was said that they couldn’t hold important positions in the system. Women’s intelligence and capabilities were neglected based on gender.

Men also face ill-treatment. They are expected to be strong in every situation. They are expected to hide their emotions; otherwise, they will not look masculine. They are taught since their childhood, boys don’t cry. According to the data from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the CDC, men are more likely to experience a heart attack than women, especially at a younger age. On average, men experience their first heart attack at age 65, while women experience their first heart attack at age 72.

There shouldn’t be any prejudice against any gender. They should be paid according to their working hours.

In the United States, someone has a heart attack every 40 seconds, resulting in approximately 805,000 heart attacks per year. Men also become the target of sexual assault and gender-based violence, but their voices are often not heard because they are men. The philosophical movement known as stoicism has its roots in classical Greece and Rome. It placed a strong focus on reason, restraint, and detachment from outside events. These objects have certain drawbacks even if they are thought to be highly advantageous for daily living. Stoicism and mistreating men are frequently associated.

Many males have learned to bottle up their feelings due to the emphasis on emotional control and suppression. Causing tension and anxiety to rise. Because stoicism emphasizes independence, some men put independence over their own needs. Lastly, males find it challenging to express their emotions in healthy ways due to the stigma around doing so, which negatively impacts both their relationships and mental health.

WHAT GIVES BIRTH TO THESE PREJUDICES?

Every society has its norms. And according to the theory of moral relativism, there is no right or wrong. One thing could be morally right in America and wrong in Pakistan. Every society disseminates its values, beliefs, and traditions as morally right. These traditions are passed from one generation to another without question. Whoever questions them is seen as a deviant. However, the prejudices I have mentioned above are common almost everywhere.

Girls are brought up differently. They are encouraged to play with dolls and be delicate, or they are told that one day they’re going to marry someone and they should learn how to cook, clean, etc. On the other hand, boys are taught to be strong, independent, brave, nonchalant, and less delicate. They are taught from a very young age that they will be the providers of their families.

WHAT IF EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED TO ALL?

By increasing productivity and diversifying the economy, a more inclusive and diverse workforce can contribute to a 50% rise in economic growth. Implementing flexible work arrangements under Norway’s Flexible Work Arrangement Policy (2018) resulted in improved work-life balance for both genders and a 1.2% increase in GDP (The Influence of Flexible Work Arrangements on work-life balance by the Journal of Applied Psychology 2019).

Another illustration is the 2019 federal paid family leave program introduced in the United States, which benefits both men and women and increases GDP by 0.7%. The impact of paid family leave on employment (National Bureau of Economic Research results).

GENDER EQUITY IN PAKISTAN: A DISTANT DREAM?

Pakistan, a country with a population of almost 251.27 million, is a developing country with the 5th largest population to accommodate. It has very few to almost zero opportunities. In a country where there are no opportunities for anyone (male, female, or transgender), the question of why Pakistan is not doing something about gender equity is ridiculous. But still, let’s talk about the 47.6% of employed people (as of 2023).

In Pakistan, gender inequity is very prominent, especially for women, because of the patriarchal mindset. The LFPR of women in Pakistan stands at 21%, well below the global percentage of 39% (National Report on the status of Women in Pakistan 2023). These statistics show that women are more subjected to gender inequity in Pakistan.

WHAT CAN WE DO TO PROMOTE GENDER BALANCE GLOBALLY?

Education and awareness about gender-based discrimination and inequity are very important. There is a dire need to educate parents to let their children do what they are capable of, regardless of their gender. Let them decide their careers. The government should make policies for men and women where both of them can work together and contribute according to their skills.

Gender-inclusive language should be used to break stereotypes. Representation in all fields should be given according to the male-to-female population ratio. Only through these measures can we create a world of gender parity.

Post-Hasina Bangladesh: Is Pakistan Up To The Task?

0
Muhammad Yunus

It took more than 560 innocent lives for the “Student Revolution” in Bangladesh to succeed. After weeks of bloody protests, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was left with no option but to flee the country and take refuge in India on August 5, 2024. Her authoritarian rule spanning over 15 years, bedizened in the garb of democracy, came to a sudden end.

India, which had the best partner in Sheikh Hasina in Dhaka, was literally shocked and found itself in a cleft stick. Whereas on the one hand, it was difficult to deny the former Prime Minister shelter in India as no other country was willing to accept her. On the other hand, New Delhi did not want the people of Bangladesh to be further alienated.

It nevertheless remains to be seen how developments finally pan out. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) of Khaleda Zia (also a former Prime Minister) is already urging India to extradite Sheikh Hasina. Besides, some Bangladeshi experts are talking about taking the bilateral water disputes to relevant international forums for arbitration should India continue to be unfair and inflexible.

No sooner had the Sheikh Hasina government collapsed, the heavily biased Indian media started hatching frivolous conspiracy theories impugning Pakistan for orchestrating Sheikh Hasina’s ouster. What could be termed as a non sequitur, China and the United States were also accused of machinations against Sheikh Hasina in their respective strategic interests. This head-spinning spin only served to further infuriate Bangladeshis, for they saw in this a blatant attempt to belittle their enormous sacrifices against a “fascist regime”.

Some Bangladeshi experts are talking about taking the bilateral water disputes to relevant international forums for arbitration should India continue to be unfair and inflexible.

In Pakistan, however, the historic development was received with much exultation and the sense of poetic justice. That was understandable. It was Sheikh Hasina’s father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who conspired with India to create Bangladesh by splitting Pakistan in 1971. As the irony would have it, the “Father of the Nation” was killed on 15 August 1975. And in August 2024, the whole world witnessed how his statues across Bangladesh were vandalized. The interim government that sworn in with Dr Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel laureate, as its head, on 8 August, lost no time in declaring to discontinue commemorating the annual National Mourning Day on 15 August.

Sheikh Hasina could have moved on but she preferred to remain stuck in a time warp when it came to Pakistan. Unlike other Bangladeshi politicians, she was mostly impervious to Pakistan’s genuine desire to start afresh in the spirit of the 9th April 1974 agreement signed between Bangladesh, India and Pakistan in New Delhi. The three countries had agreed to forgive and forget the mistakes of the past in order to promote reconciliation.

While from Pakistan’s viewpoint there was nothing left to be settled between the two countries, Sheikh Hasina kept on insisting that Pakistan must formally apologize for “all the crimes Pakistan committed against the people of Bangladesh”. Members of her party (Awami League) would also publicly demand to put on trial some 195 army officers who had allegedly perpetrated atrocities in the erstwhile East Pakistan. In short, Sheikh Hasina would not budge. No wonder, she never paid a bilateral visit to Pakistan during her long years in office.

On its part, Pakistan never gave up trying how to accommodate Bangladesh. In July 2002, President Pervez Musharraf paid a three-day official visit to Bangladesh. During the visit he publicly regretted the 71 war excesses. After laying wreath at the National Martyrs Memorial outside Dhaka, he wrote in the official visitors’ book as follows: “Your brother and sisters in Pakistan share the pains of the events of 1971. The excesses committed during the unfortunate period are regrettable. Let us bury the past in the spirit of magnanimity. Let not the light of the future be dimmed. Let us move forward together. Courage to compromise is greater than to confront.”

On its part, Pakistan never gave up trying how to accommodate Bangladesh.

This proffered the best way forward and the then Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Khaleda Zia, had apparently decided to let bygones be bygones. That helped. Years of bonhomie followed. However, when Sheikh Hasina came to power again in 2009, she could not help but revive the apology issue. Resultantly, the bilateral relationship yet again came under pressure. She visibly and unhelpfully became Modi’s junior partner. Even SAARC was not spared. Its 19th summit that was to be hosted by Pakistan in November 2014 had to be postponed as India refused to attend, making the 18 September 2014 Uri attack as an alibi. Bangladesh along with Afghanistan also regretted to attend.

When Sheikh Hasina came to power again in 2009, she could not help but revive the apology issue.

I had the opportunity to have a brief conversation with Sheikh Hasina at the residence of the Bangladeshi High Commissioner in New Delhi during her official visit to India in April 2017. Besides conveying greetings to her from the Pakistani leadership, I told her that the people of Pakistan were also keenly looking forward to hosting her. She did not respond except to express the hope that I was enjoying my stay in India. In fact, she never wanted to pay a bilateral visit to Pakistan. She clearly made the bilateral relations hostage to the apology issue. Perhaps, the word “regret” and that, too, during Khaleda Zia’s premiership, was difficult for her to digest.

Be that as it may, Sheikh Hasina is no longer at the helm. Though in politics nothing is impossible, it may be a safe wager to say that it seems highly unlikely that she would ever return to power again. There is now an opportunity for Pakistan to reach out to Bangladesh, putting bilateral ties on a positive irreversible trajectory.

The most important thing Pakistan needs to understand is that Bangladesh-India relations are mutually critical. Islamabad must not get concerned if their relations come back on track. Diplomacy mostly works incrementally; the slow process needs patience and perseverance. To expect quick results would be a wishful thinking. Islamabad must not get carried away either by taking premature steps. It should also avoid seeing as pandering to Bangladesh and joining hands against India. There is still no clarity how long the present interim government will be in power. For one, I do not see elections taking place in Bangladesh this year.

The most important thing Pakistan needs to understand is that Bangladesh-India relations are mutually critical.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s felicitations to Chief Advisor Yunus were in order. His subsequent letter to the latter assuring him of every possible assistance to the people of Bangladesh to cope with the destruction caused by heavy floods was also the right thing to do. As Prime Minister Sharif underlined, Pakistan would always be standing with the people of Bangladesh. It is encouraging that the Bangladesh cricket team did not cancel its trip and is presently in Pakistan for a two-test matches series. The warm welcome the Bangladeshi team received from all and sundry in Pakistan will go a long way towards promoting mutual goodwill.

Some analysts in Pakistan are suggesting that Islamabad must send a special emissary to Bangladesh. To them, the time is of the essence. Pakistan must not let this opportunity go. I have been propounding for the appointment of a special envoy for Bangladesh for years now. But in my view, this not the appropriate time to do so. Islamabad must keep a low profile and let the Pakistan High Commissioner in Dhaka handle the matters at this stage.

Rather than focusing on politics, it may be worthwhile for Islamabad to consider sending an economic and trade delegation to Dhaka. That will not only be good optics but also convey our sincere intentions to work in our mutual benefit. Pakistan can also consider engaging in bilateral sports activities beyond cricket.

Yunus will likely travel to New York this September for the UNGA session. Islamabad must seek a bilateral meeting. The meeting, should it come through, would require extremely careful preparations both in terms of optics and substance. Needless to say that excessive and empty rhetoric is a burden diplomacy barely brooks for long.

Hopefully, Islamabad is up to the task in the case of Bangladesh unlike Afghanistan post-August 15, 2021.

China’s Global Security Initiative For A Peaceful World

0
Global Security Initiative

President Xi Jinping first suggested the term of Global Security Initiative (GSI) on April 21, 2022 at the Boao Forum for Asia. It followed the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Global Development Initiative (GDI). Following the publication of a thorough document on the GSI, one can see the changing patterns in Chinese foreign policy towards the global systems. This paper, however, seeks to examine how GSI might be a helpful contribution to create a peaceful and safe global order in the area and beyond.

The first principle of the GSI emphasizes on the dedication to shared, comprehensive, and sustainable security as a whole approach that has to keep security in both conventional and non-traditional spheres. By improving world security governance through the means of collective security initiatives, the core cause of wars is supposed to be eliminated.

Respecting the sovereignty and geographical integrity of every state is the second principle. In this regard, every state across the world has equal rights to carry out their security policies in a manner that aids in the decrease of conflicts and is necessary to sustain world security in modern international relations. China is thus the first in honoring the territorial sovereignty of smaller and weaker nations, which the strong governments have historically transgressed.

By improving world security governance through the means of collective security initiatives, the core cause of wars is supposed to be eliminated.

The third principle is the will to follow the UN Charter’s ideas. For this reason, China advocates multilateralism while opposing the Cold War mindset of bloc antagonism and unilateralism. The vision of global security governance proposed by President Xi depends on the correct application of the UN Charter’s concept of preservation of peace and stability on the worldwide level.

According to the fourth principle indicated in the concept paper, China emphasized on maintaining individual security, shared security, and indivisible security between conventional and non-traditional issues, all of which combined together. The concept paper emphasizes the necessity of a balanced security architecture accomplished via a multilateral platform.

Conflict resolution via peaceful communication and consultation is the fifth pillar of the new security paradigm. By means of peaceful dialogue and enhancement of bilateral and multilateral connections, GSI provides a chance for governments to disperse tension and eradicate the fundamental cause of the conflict escalation. Concluded by China in recent past, the Saudi-Iran reconciliation is an example of how in the framework of GSI it seeks to help to the regional security.

China has sped up information technology collaboration in order to improve cyberspace governance and worldwide connectivity.

Maintaining security in both conventional (military security) and non-traditional spheres (energy security, food security, environmental security, and cybersecurity) is the last guiding concept. Security issues alter quickly in the current age of development. Apart from state and personal security, energy security is vital for the survival and growth of a state’s economy and environmental security is required for the sustainability of the worldwide ecosystem. China has sped up information technology collaboration in order to improve cyberspace governance and worldwide connectivity. China has so started the “Global Data Security Initiative” with this aim as well.

The Chinese GSI signifies a change in the global security scene. Critics of GSI contend that China is using it to offset the global influence of the United States. Another argument is that the Chinese GSI fuels division among ASEAN members. Many Asian, African, and Latin American nations depending on US help are more open to the GSI paradigm. GSI is thus seen as a possible hazard to the current unipolar global order. Thus, the western academics contend that the US should change its foreign policy to concentrate more on the models of conflict resolution and peace building.

The continuous wars and conflicts in the many parts of the world need a thorough response alternative to the GSI instead of a sporadic and reactive one. GSI presents Xi’s diplomatic vision to interact with the rest of the world, lower tensions between two strong governments, China and the US, and foster peace from generation to generation all around.

ChatGPT Is Threatening Academic Integrity In Pakistan

0
ChatGPT

The multifaceted functions of ChatGPT in the contemporary international system have influenced traditional social infrastructures of states where the dramatic rise of smartphone culture has become a primary support for promoting artificial intelligence (AI) tools. It altered the conventional roles of individuals and organizations in societies while revolutionizing their digital communication capabilities with the support of AI-centric advanced technologies.

The basic function of ChatGPT is to disseminate information with the support of online data while enabling its users to develop instant access to a variety of content. Its diverse operations offer several benefits, such as finding quick answers and varying explanations of issues. The learning provided by this AI-supported application makes it convenient for users to remain updated and well-informed about the multilevel developments of the international system. Its increasing worldwide appreciation provided several digital opportunities to the states, which could not be divorced from certain challenges.

This AI-supported application acts as an efficient discussion partner and a brainstorming companion for its users.

Besides admiring its positive features, the discussion on the growing interconnections between traditional states’ societal structures can only be completed with an understanding of the role of ChatGPT in education.

The use of ChatGPT in education has become an opportunity for different academic communities because this AI-supported application acts as an efficient discussion partner and a brainstorming companion for its users. It provides its users with multiple services, presenting different ideas, giving several suggestions, and helping them understand the international system’s emerging perspectives and its various evolutionary phases.

The increasing reliance of academic communities on the multidimensional services of ChatGPT has affected the traditional education system of various states.

The growing popularity of these AI-centric digital platforms in the higher studies of Pakistan has dramatically increased its users across the country due to multiple benefits such as enhancing diverse and interactive learning, availing free services of personalized assistance, getting resource efficiency, and accessing information in the required languages and based on desired formats. Its valuable addition to Pakistan’s education system has raised the satisfaction levels of university students, and its interdisciplinary nature has made it an instant source of supplementary learning in higher education.

The challenge of academic integrity has engulfed the entire mechanism of higher education in the country

This AI application’s ability to provide the required information in multiple languages allowed students to use it comfortably, even in their native languages. In this way, the growing societal admiration of AI-centric studying tools in Pakistan has become a common practice in the country’s higher education institutions. It has started reflecting a considerable positive impact on the traditional education structure of remote or underserved areas where access to advanced education resources is a significant challenge under numerous logistical constraints and financial pressures.

However, the challenge of academic integrity has engulfed the entire mechanism of higher education in the country, where students commonly prefer to use the interdisciplinary functions of ChatGPT. It helps a student produce various content related to their major assignments and research projects without estimating its worse impacts on the culture of research and development. Consequently, the country’s mainstream education institutions have started witnessing a high number of plagiarism cases. This factor has compromised the originality of existing research work and undermined the values of critical thinking and innovative ideas in higher studies. Several reports are internationally published about the rising cases of AI-generated plagiarism in academic research due to the lack of sufficient digital ethics in societies where Pakistan’s low literacy rate is a significant case.

The question of academic integrity in Pakistan has already become a serious national concern due to a persistent quantitative rise in research publications and academic books in the country. The race to secure high ratings in the publication has been fostered by the arrival of AI tools in academia, and their widespread usage has augmented this crisis. It facilitated higher study students of diverse disciplines to copy the AI-generated research arguments and descriptions of various phenomena in their major research projects under different degree programs.

Several reports are internationally published about the rising cases of AI-generated plagiarism

It is pertinent to mention here the critical role of AI-generated software applications in accessing online information without considering their contexts and validities. The higher study students generally rely on the arguments and analysis generated by the AI tools without verifying their resource authenticities and validity. This scenario considerably damages the fundamental values of academic integrity, parallel to underestimating the scope of innovative research in society. Thus, the diminishing academic contribution of the country in innovative research and critical thinking has marginalized the analytical and professional skills in higher studies.

The lack of adequate awareness of the civilized patterns of the emerging digital world is the primary factor raising the cases of academic dishonesty and the high rate of plagiarism in education. It has raised the citations of fabricated information and false facts in academic research, parallel to degrading the ethical standards and moral commitments of academic communities in the country. In other words, there is no harm in saying that the increasing misuse of AI research tools such as ChatGPT has targeted the fundamental concept of research worldwide, especially in the states with abstruse digital practices in society.

It helps a student produce various content related to their major assignments and research projects without estimating its worse impacts on the culture of research and development.

Pakistan could be treated as one of the leading exceptional cases due to a swift transformation of its society in the digital domain without substantial knowledge of the digital world and an inadequately developed digital structure of society. In this scenario, the widespread promotion of ChatGPT in Pakistan’s society raised the misuse of this AI tool due to the growing overreliance of education communities on it. This overreliance has eventually compromised the core values of academic integrity in Pakistan.

Therefore, the government is required to create a careful examination of countrywide digital governance with a clear national vision based on a rational approach. Adopting a conceptually robust and practically applicable legislative framework could help improve Pakistan’s existing IT culture. The government’s formal decision-makers need to align the national IT vision with the emerging realities of AI technologies while accepting them as an essential part of the contemporary international system.

The quest for upholding and aligning the country’s IT culture with the newly emerging world of AI-supported digital realities also requires the government to focus on various awareness campaigns. Launching such a campaign related to the spread of AI-centric ethical guidelines has become a pressing need of the nation and its leading education institutions. Additionally, a combination of strict academic policies and the formulation of new assessment mechanisms in academics could help government authorities achieve their desired objectives. The development of new assessment mechanisms in higher studies could not be ensured with the support of existing plagiarism detection digital applications. It has made supporting the idea of academic integrity a difficult task for the government. Launching an updated and improved version of digital governance could let the Pakistan positively integrate AI-centric digital tools with the ongoing education system to support and preserve the country’s core values of academic integrity.

India’s Dark Agenda: Global Silence, Human Rights Ignored

0
Human Rights

Although India is often praised as a model democracy, under its surface lies a sinister plan meant to attack its political rivals outside. Particularly in recent times, the murder of a Sikh leader in Canada raises issues not only concerning human issues but also challenges the silence of the world community.

Disappointingly, international institutions such as the United Nations and the United States— which asserts itself to defend human rights — have been silent, which adds to the complexity of the problem. This silence suggests that maybe these international powers have interests that keep them from criticizing India.

The murder of a Sikh leader in Canada raises not only concerning human rights issues but also challenges the silence of the world community.

Given all this, other nations including Pakistan should reflect on their policies. To end breaches of human rights in the region, India has to strongly oppose its approach. The whole community should intervene right away to prevent India from continuing its criminal activities.

The United Nations should likewise prioritize this matter and launch an objective inquiry to enable the truth to surface. One may conclude that it is unavoidable for the world community to come together against India’s agenda. Should this issue be overlooked now, the effects might be more severe down the road.

The silence of international organizations can cause other nations in the region to violate human rights. Consequently, every country should give this matter some thought and resolve these challenges under a shared approach. India’s disregard of the deaths of its rivals suggests that the whole community has moral obligations. People are offering lines of questions.

Many big nations are hesitant to address the matter honestly due to commercial and diplomatic relations to India. Strong reaction to India’s actions by international institutions such as the United States and the United Nations should have been taken, but their silence now begs serious issues about the global conscience.

The silence of the United States and the United Nations adds to the complexity of the problem.

Think about geographic goals first of human rights. These nations concentrate on making sure their connections with India are not affected rather than voicing criticism on New Delhi’s policies.

America’s silence might also result from its own geopolitical goals. India is a major friend, and the US regards it as a major actor in the region to counter China’s influence. As such, the US is more interested in supporting India than in criticizing its internal matters. This kind of thinking has enabled India even more to continue resisting its foes abroad as it believes that world powers will not interfere.

Likewise, the purpose of the United Nations has sometimes been dubious. The United Nations vows to speak out against breaches of human rights, even if its lack of action and apathy has damaged its reputation all around. The non-action of the United Nations against India indicates the lack of interest of the world community and its incompetence to carry out a functional purpose.

About India’s actions, Pakistan and other countries should unite to develop a comprehensive strategy to pinpoint a feasible answer to this problem. Pakistan has to advocate on this issue abroad and put pressure on international organizations to follow strict policies against India. The international community should also examine India’s actions against its enemy and assign culpability before justice.

It is long past that the whole society comes together against India’s posture in order to maintain international stability and peace.

Not only the United States and the United Nations, but also the entire community should reconsider its beliefs and responsibilities and act with efficiency to protect human rights. Apart from providing the victims with justice, practical actions against India will contribute to promoting respect for human rights elsewhere. It is long past that the whole world comes together against India’s posture to maintain international stability and peace.

ASEAN’s Evolution In The Global Context

0
ASEAN

Although some of the most powerful countries in the world are now involved in conflict, recession, and inflation, the ASEAN mostly emphasizes the need of peace and economic stability. Based in Southeast Asia, ASEAN is a regional body of 10 members: Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia, Laos, Indonesia, Cambodia, Burma, and Brunei Darussalam.

Laos takes over as ASEAN chairperson in 2024. The subject this year is “ASEAN: Enhancing Connectivity and Resilience”. Emphasizing the ASEAN 2024 topic by means of chances and addressing rising issues centers the ASEAN community.

Commonly referred to as Laos, the ASEAN 2024 host nation is officially named as Lao People’s Democratic Republic (LPDR). Being in Southeast Asia, Laos is primarily connected with being the “Land of a Million Elephants,” as it will provide wealth to Laotians.

Established in Bangkok, Thailand, with five founding fathers from Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, ASEAN was born out of the “Bangkok Declaration”. Brunei Darussalam joined the grouping in 1984; Vietnam followed in 1995; Lao PDR and Myanmar in 1997; and Cambodia in 1999.

Right now, around 60% of ASEAN’s whole population falls under the age of 35. It makes the area a dynamic market for sophisticated sciences — robotics, social media, e-commerce platforms, artificial intelligence, and everything around. Half of such a population by 2030 will be middle class members.

GREETINGS ON YOUR 57TH BIRTHDAY, ASEAN!

After 1967, the ASEAN community commemorates its establishment every eighth of August. This celebration reminds us of the goals of the ASEAN founding fathers and how they developed into what ASEAN is all about in the modern society.

Emphasizing connectedness and resilience among members in sectors like sustainable development, digital transformation, and resilient economies, the 57th ASEAN Day highlighted. Through government-to-government and people-to-people interactions, ASEAN promoted economic development, social change, and cultural appreciation by means of shared and cooperative efforts to fit a changing global scene.

ASEAN is destined to be a powerful Asian regional grouping. Given the development of ASEAN, one can see that its exceptional qualities — strategic geographic position, varied cultures, customs, traditions, and political systems and philosophies — which also challenge its fundamental foundation. Future challenges might arise from a territory with such varied civilizations.

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR SOUTH CHINA SEA

Among uncertainty and national interests, ASEAN aims to have the South China Sea code of conduct completed by 2026. ASEAN Secretary General Kao Kim Hourn visited Washington in June 2024 to advocate the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between ASEAN and the United States; he noted the situation that is becoming worse and requested the parties to use moderation.

Although applicants have been fervently advocating a code of behavior for many years, the gravity may appear different from that of the non-claimants as they may not want to endanger their particular interactions with China. Although the code of behavior was constantly in development, China has never adopted such a stance as it never achieved its final form of legal bindingness.
Real manifestations of the lack of the ASEAN posture in the South China Sea Code of Conduct include different points of view, complicated issues, and split desires. Regarding the code of behavior, ASEAN is definitely not unified. Vietnam and the Philippines have open lines of contact with China separately and concurrently. For example, the Philippines has gone through many unpleasant events that have led to diplomatic objections against China.

THE MYANMAR CONUNDRUM   

The member nations of ASEAN have been indecisive for more than three years in trying for a regional settlement on the present situation of Myanmar. Both Laos and Cambodia are authoritarian in character, hence, they assist the dictatorship in certain respects. Under a junta government that destroyed democracy in 2021, other ASEAN nations like Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia maintained some degree of contact with the opposition in Myanmar. At this moment in time, most ASEAN nations appear to be primarily focused on eliminating violence.

Though ASEAN is a regional entity with great goals, fundamental problems still exist. For instance, the internal conflicts of the ASEAN members mirror the issues in the South China Sea conflict and the junta government of Myanmar.

FUTURE ASEAN TRAJECTORY: WHAT IS IT?

Indeed, there are many clear economic signals, socio-cultural contributions, and images reflecting Asia; yet, in politics, there are certain gaps, particularly those that really affect the international order.

One may find both good and bad aspects in resilience and connectedness. Positive because ASEAN multilateral diplomacy is headed toward regional cooperation. The bad side of it is that some of the most crucial fundamental elements remain unsolved. Soft and cultural tolerance does not convert into a toolkit of fundamental global concerns of relevance and significance. ASEAN should rethink its multilateral commitment; unlike certain groupings or even treaties, an issue of one affect all. Independent bilateral diplomacy should not waver under a member of another nation in regional diplomacy. Pushing for the regional ambitions reflecting its pillars and charter calls for great cooperation, coordination, and dedication.

Third Plenum: Priorities To Remodel China’s Economic Future

0
Chinese Economy

China is aware that its 2035 goal to build a more equitable, innovative, and greener economy and the 2049 goal of modernization are within reach. However, rational but difficult choices must be made and challenges faced head-on now to realize them. The third plenary session of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPC) 20th Central Committee in July 2024 came at a critical juncture for China’s economic challenges and, therefore, focused on deepening economic reforms to address a range of pressing issues facing Chinese economy and society.

The third plenum, therefore, enacted much-awaited structural reforms. China set ambitious long-term policy goals and unveiled a range of economic reforms and policies to address long-standing issues hindering growth and recovery. While reforms are modest, yet comprehensively cover all aspects of economy and governance. These reforms will have a substantial impact on the country’s development trajectory and thus their impact should be well understood.

The CCP plenums are quasi-annual meetings held by the Central Committee. After the National Congress, which is held every five years and elects the Central Committee, they are the most important and high-level political gatherings in China. Historically, these plenums have been the platform from which the government launches seminal policies and decisions, such as the “reform and opening up policy” in 1978 and the easing of the One-Child policy in 2013.

Although past plenums have seen major reforms and policy decisions, the July 2024 plenum did not announce any drastic pivots and instead put in more granular reforms that align with the country’s current development trajectory. The Central Committee approved decision on Further Comprehensive Deepening of Reforms and Advancing Chinese-style Modernization. It named “high-quality development” as China’s “top priority” and laid out structural reforms to be completed by 2029, the 80th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.

Historically, these plenums have been the platform from which the government launches seminal policies and decisions

This document outlined the planned economic reforms for the coming years and focused in part on policies to promote the “new-type industrialization” policy. This initiative seeks to move China’s industries up the value chain and boost their global competitiveness by focusing on digitization, advanced manufacturing, secure supply chains, and developing core and emerging technologies. “High-quality development is the primary task of building a modern socialist country in an all-round way,” the statement said.

Meanwhile, external factors are anticipated to encourage reinforcement of China’s internal competencies, especially in the technological sector, aiming to enhance the robustness and self-reliance of vital industrial and supply networks. In recent years, the US and the EU, as well as other allies, have increased pressure on China by introducing a variety of policies aimed at countering China’s growing influence in key supply chains. These include the US sanctions on key technology exports to China and recent tariff hikes, as well as the EU’s growing scrutiny of various Chinese imports.

Meanwhile, external factors are anticipated to encourage reinforcement of China’s internal competencies, especially in the technological sector

To mitigate this, the Central Committee may prioritize enhancing domestic high-end, intelligent, and green manufacturing, consolidating advantageous industries, and fostering strategic emerging industries, such as semiconductors, alongside encouraging collaborative innovation across the industrial chain. Decisions have also been taken to help with business matchmaking, location analysis, market entry strategy, market research, and supply chain re-engineering.

While technology innovation initiative was first introduced in 2002 during the 16th National Congress, it has become an increasingly important aspect of China’s industrial policy in recent years. In September 2023, President Xi Jinping stressed the “vital role of high-quality development in advancing new-type industrialization”, emphasizing the need to adapt and lead the ongoing scientific and technological revolution.

China views technology innovation as a new growth engine that could help the economy transition from the old model fueled by infrastructure investment and debt expansion. The third plenum announced policies related to promoting high-end, intelligent, and green manufacturing processes, consolidating existing industrial strengths and expanding strategic emerging industries, and proactively developing industries of the future to stay ahead in global technological and industrial revolutions.

In September 2023, President Xi Jinping stressed the “vital role of high-quality development in advancing new-type industrialization”

Meanwhile, China has been proactively building economic relationships with countries in Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe to strengthen its supply chain resilience. This strategy is expected to remain steadfast in the short term.

Chinese private sector has experienced uneven recovery since the COVID-19 pandemic, with private companies falling behind their public counterparts across measures such as value output and investment. The third plenum announced new policies to support the growth and recovery of the private sector, including ensuring equal treatments for state-owned and private enterprises through institutional and legal frameworks, protecting the property rights and interests of private entrepreneurs, and supporting the growth of small, medium, and micro-enterprises, as well as individual businesses.

Xi’s government has also strengthened its national security apparatus in the past decade.  The plenum pledged to ensure “security,” which means national security concerns could continue to drive policymaking. They also vowed to give “better play to the role of the market”, while noting that market forces need to be better managed, and retained a previous promise to “unswervingly” develop the state sector.

China also pledged to “improve people’s livelihoods” at the plenum, which is essentially a continuation of Xi’s “common prosperity” agenda. While previous leaders in post-Mao China were content to let some get rich first, Xi believes the time has come to share the fruits of development more widely among its population. The plenum acknowledged the need to improve “basic and bottom-up livelihood, solve the most direct and realistic interests of the people and continuously meet the people’s yearning for a better life”.  This is the most promising parts of the reform agenda, since channeling a greater share of income to households would help to advance a much-needed rebalancing toward consumption.

It was also decided to improve job markets, social security, education system and the medical system. Likewise, the need to address risks in the property market and other threats to the economy have been heighted with determination to put requisite strategies in place to rectify the problems.

Relieving the financial squeeze on local governments that have built up huge amounts of debt after a crackdown on heavy borrowing by property developers pushed the real estate industry into crisis, cutting off a vital source of tax revenues from sales of land-use rights. The urgent need to reform the tax system and better integrate cities and the countryside has also been emphasized.

The leadership also vowed to revamp the fiscal, taxation and financial systems, which signal their concerns about how to address the debt crises faced by Chinese local governments. Debt has piled up at municipal governments, after three years of pandemic controls drained their coffers and the property slump led to a sharp decline in land sales, which they rely on for income. That poses risks to the country’s banking system and economic growth.

Besides the long-term structural reform priorities, policymakers also promised to achieve short-term economic goals, including a 5% GDP growth target for 2024. That came days after China released disappointing economic data for the second quarter of this year. GDP grew 4.7% year-on-year in the April-to-June period, marking the weakest growth since the first quarter of last year, according to data from the National Bureau of Statistics. The figure slowed from 5.3% in the previous three months and missed the 5.1% increase forecast.

It has committed to peaking carbon emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060.

To achieve the annual goals, “China will proactively expand domestic demand” and develop “new-quality productivity forces,” That could mean channeling resources to favored sectors, such as high-tech manufacturing, while gradually curbing the role of sunset industries like property development, according to Evans-Pritchard from Capital Economics. Analysts say that the coming months could offer more details on how Xi plans to revive the economy.

Sustainable development remains a cornerstone of China’s policy framework. It has committed to peaking carbon emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. China has now introduced measures to accelerate this green transition, promoting renewable energy, enhancing energy efficiency, and supporting the development of a circular economy. These efforts underscore China’s dedication to combating climate change and fostering a harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature.

The decisions taken at the third plenum will propel China in a new era of reforms and prepare it to face the challenges emerging around it that may restrain its development. China is now determined to ensure it realizes its second millennial goal of rejuvenation of the motherland by the middle of the century. It plans to do this by building a high-standard socialist market economy, improving macroeconomic governance and the national strategic planning system as well as policy coordination mechanisms.

Other initiatives include: deepening reform of the fiscal and tax systems along with overall financial system; improving mechanisms for implementing the coordinated regional development strategy; promoting integrated urban-rural development; pursuing high-standard opening up; advancing whole-process people’s democracy; promoting socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics; deepening reform in the cultural sector; ensuring and improving the people’s wellbeing; deepening reform in ecological conservation; modernizing China’s national security system and capacity; expediting national defense and military reforms; and improving the party’s leadership.

So far China has demonstrated its determination to fully implement its short and long-term goals. Now it is in the final decades of achieving its cherished goal of national rejuvenation of the motherland. Whether it is able to achieve it will depend on the decisions China is taking today and will continue to need strong and sagacious leadership.

Emerging Technologies: Carrying the Carriers Forward

0
Emerging Technologies

Clausewitzian wisdom suggests that every age has its own patterns of war and limiting conditions. Chariots, a dominant factor in the battlefields of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, were eventually supplanted by the rise of heavy cavalry. The thickly armored knights of the medieval era dominated frontlines but were made redundant by the advent of longbows, while gunpowder rendered them completely ineffective.

Successive generations of rifles and guns emerged and disappeared from battle arena, and the introduction of tanks and aircraft in World War I eventually brought trench warfare to an end. World War II witnessed, the once-decisive battleships eclipsing in front of aircraft carriers and submarines.

The unparalleled strategic flexibility provided by the rapid deployment of aircraft carriers transformed maritime and conventional warfare.

History has come full circle, as the experts are now debating the continued relevance of aircraft carriers due to the rise of advanced and sophisticated missile technologies. Since their inception, aircraft carriers have consistently served as symbols of military might, sources of power projection, and credible deterrents. The unparalleled strategic flexibility provided by the rapid deployment of aircraft carriers transformed maritime and conventional warfare. Additionally, they have demonstrated their value in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts.

The argument about the redundancy of aircraft carriers stems from revolutionary advancements in missile technologies. Contrary to this, the multi-layered defense systems of aircraft carriers make them resilient to such attacks. The advanced electronic warfare and missile defense technologies, with reliable early warning and interception capabilities, enable them to intercept high-speed missiles. Furthermore, saturating the defenses of a target is an old technique that can be employed against aircraft carriers; however, one cannot assume that navies are unprepared for such scenarios.

The skeptics in this domain also base their argument on the concept of distributed lethality. This involves using smaller, more agile vessels and distributing offensive and defensive capabilities more widely to enhance the overall resilience of naval forces by denying the adversary the opportunity to target a single high-value asset. However, the use of aircraft carriers and distributed lethality are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary approaches.

The skeptics in this domain also base their argument on the concept of distributed lethality.

An aircraft carrier cannot achieve its objectives and becomes a vulnerable target unless supplemented with numerous smaller, nimble vessels through network-centric warfare. This enhances the defense capability by complicating and diluting the adversary’s target efforts by presenting several elusive targets while the aircraft carriers continue to project power. This approach also facilitates real-time data sharing and coordinated attack strategies.

In addition, as emerging technologies are rapidly dominating the battlefields and modifying military strategies, aircraft carriers are also expected to follow suit. One significant future development in this regard will be the integration of AI-backed unmanned combat aerial vehicles with aircraft carriers. UCAV swarms will not only help reduce the operational cost of the aircraft carriers but will also increase their lethality in attack and will make their defenses more formidable. Leveraging AI-Enhanced Decision Support Systems and AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance and Logistics will also enable aircraft carriers to maintain their dominance in an increasingly contested future environment.

The last but old argument posed against the future relevance of aircraft carriers is their economic viability. However, the substantial USD 13 billion cost of building and USD 1 billion for annually operating these majestic platforms is justified by the strategic dividends they provide. The economic argument is also overshadowed by the fact that almost all the major and middle powers either possess this technology already or are striving to acquire it.

One significant future development in this regard will be the integration of AI-backed unmanned combat aerial vehicles with aircraft carriers.

Currently, the United States operates the most advanced fleet of 11 aircraft carriers, followed by India, China, the United Kingdom, and Italy, each possessing two aircraft carriers. Russia and France are operating one aircraft carrier each. Furthermore, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, and Australia are in the phase of building aircraft carriers of different types or are modifying existing vessels tailored to their requirements.

The future relevance of aircraft carriers also hinges on their ability to enable a state with strategic signaling and provide geopolitical influences by overcoming the limitations provided by geostrategic factors. As the global order is transforming and great powers’ competition is intensifying, oceans are likely to emerge as theatres of contestation. The ability of a state to project power offshore and freedom of navigation is going to be potent determinants of superpower status. Therefore, the Indo-Pacific region will particularly be the center of attention of major powers urging all the contenders to enhance their power through aircraft carriers.

The future relevance of aircraft carriers also hinges on their ability to enable a state with strategic signaling and provide geopolitical influences.

When the time comes, no matter how majestic and potent, every weapon eventually diminishes from the battlefield arenas. However, such a time for aircraft carriers does not seem to be on the horizon. With the integration of emerging technologies and adaptive deployment strategies, aircraft carriers can continue to dominate maritime warfare and serve as an indispensable source of strategic power projection, ensuring freedom of navigation for major powers.

The Bangladesh Impact!

0
Bangladesh

The enormity of the students’ movement and its impact has yet to be fully appreciated in Bangladesh and the region. What has transpired in Bangladesh in recent weeks will have repercussions far beyond its borders and should not be written off as a random phenomenon. The ripples of political evolution and dramatic turn of events will be felt across the South Asian region in particular and the world in general.

Led by the young student community from across the political and social divide, not only represents a revolt against autocratic and dictatorial politics but also against elite capture, personality cults, and hereditary politics of select families masquerading as democratic dispensations. What is significant is the complete rejection of India’s quasi-colonial stranglehold on Bangladesh since 1971.

The enormity of the students’ movement and its impact has yet to be fully appreciated in Bangladesh and the region.

The political cataclysm resulting from the protests is not a sudden and instantaneous occurrence. It is the result of stifled political grievances of Bangladeshis over decades and repression by Sheikh Hasina’s government over the past 15 years. Once considered a savior of Bangladesh’s democracy, Hasina became an authoritarian leader stifling individual civic rights, cracking down on freedom of expression, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and the use of other forms of torture against dissidents and critics.

The growing anger over these injustices, rampant corruption, and rising cronyism remained largely masked by a significant improvement in the economy under Hasina’s leadership. Finally, allegations of institutional electoral rigging and blatant misuse of power by Hasina to secure the fourth consecutive term in January proved the last straw that broke the camel’s back. This revolt is not just against politicians, it is a clarion call to clean up the entire system of unconstitutional elements and practices of state institutions including the judiciary and bureaucracy.

There is cautious optimism as Bangladesh struggles with the repercussions of protests. As Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus leads a confident interim government, it remains to be seen whether Bangladesh succeeds in establishing stability, or whether tumultuous political unrest will enter a new phase of uncertainty.

This revolt is not just against politicians, it is a clarion call to clean up the entire system of unconstitutional elements.

The first test of the interim government will be to restore order, bring to justice those responsible for committing excesses during the protests, initiate the institutional and structural reforms required to restore the democratic credentials of Bangladesh and ensure free and fair elections at the earliest to meet the high expectations of the people. If these expectations are met, it will complete the political evolution and we may witness a different Bangladesh emerge, consistent with its liberal, secular, and democratic ethos. If not, it has the potential to divide the people and plunge Bangladesh into chaos and civil war.

A long drawn-out interim government is not an option as that may provide space to not only the un-constitutional forces to manipulate the political vacuum but also enable the extremist ideologies to carve a niche for themselves which may not augur well for the country. The greatest fear is the rise of fundamentalist ideologies that ay spread to other parts of the region.

Lack of political stability will also increase Bangladesh’s economic conditions that could disturb the economic stability of the entire South Asia region.  Bangladesh’s economic performance had enhanced its position nearly to the rank of an “Asian Tiger.” Bangladesh became India’s largest trade partner in South Asia, and India became the second-largest trading partner for Bangladesh in Asia after China.

The greatest fear is the rise of fundamentalist ideologies that may spread to other parts of the region.

These strong trade ties, boosted under Sheikh Hasina’s pro-India rule, nurtured India’s dream of building a regional subgroup centered on trade from the Bay of Bengal region and making a free trade area connecting Myanmar, Thailand, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka who are members of the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic cooperation. Therefore, the ouster of Hasina is a setback for Indian influence, security trade, and the dream of connectivity using Bangladesh as the connecting node to East Asia and beyond.

Hasina had rebuilt roads and bridges linking Dhaka with Kolkata and Agartala, renewed railway links, and enabled access to cargo ships on the Brahmaputra River and its tributaries. Security cooperation also increased between India and Bangladesh as Hasina assisted India in quelling the rebellion in Assam by refusing to provide safe refuge to rebels from across the border.

India is now desperately trying to implicate Pakistan by insinuating that Pakistan and China were abetting the protests.

However, what is significant to note in the regional and international geopolitics and geostrategic competition is that she favored India over China for a $1bn river development project and secured a deal with the Indian Adwani Group in the power sector for a whopping $ 1.7 billion. By side-lining China in the large development projects Hasina certainly sent a strong message of support for India making Bangladesh stand with India and Western powers in their competition with China for political and economic interest in this strategically important region. Having said that, it would be erroneous to believe that any new dispensation in Bangladesh would be inimical to India. Bangladesh’s geographical proximity will continue to oblige it to have friendly and somewhat cooperative relations with India.

Concerned about the loss of their trusted partner in Bangladesh, India is now desperately trying to implicate Pakistan by insinuating that Pakistan and China were abetting the protests. These false allegations completely ignore and undermine the basic issues of governance and democracy which were simmering under the surface for decades and were effectively vented out in the form of apolitical uprising of the youth. There are lessons to be learned from the events in Bangladesh, not only for India but also for the other South Asian nations.

India Unblocks Chinese Investment To Boost Exports

0
Narendra Modi

NEW DELHI – India has started clearing the way for Chinese investment by approving proposals involving companies from China.

Narendra Modi-led coalition government opted for the move after an annual review of Indian economy presented last month argued in favor of attracting investment from China.

It was in 2020 when the Modi government – a time when the Hindu nationalist BJP was in power with a strong majority – had imposed restrictions on Chinese investment after the deadly border skirmishes.

According to The Economic Times which quoted sources, an inter-ministerial panel has cleared investment proposals in the electronics manufacturing sector, which include some Chinese companies and others with connections to the neighboring country.

These proposals involve Chinese electronics giant Luxshare, a vendor for Apple, as well as a joint venture between Bhagwati Products (Micromax) and Huaqin Technology, with the latter holding a minority stake.

WHY THIS CHANGE? THE BACKGROUND

The decision taken in 2020 was based upon purely political considerations. It was also greatly influenced by the fact that Modi portrays himself as the champion of Indian nationalism. But his version is a product of the extreme Hindu nationalism which leaves no or very little room for a holistic approach.

However, the election results earlier this year saw the BJP losing simple majority amid the tall claims made about a thumping victory by gaining a two-thirds majority. Hence, Modi was forced to form a coalition government comprising even those parties which aren’t part of his National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

The election results meant that the Indian people had rejected the economic development vision of Modi – reliance on a high growth rate while banking on infrastructure development and high-tech industries while favoring the big businesses.

But the net result was: concentration of wealth that is widening the rich-poor divide and lack of employment opportunities for the millions of youths.

Thus, the economic factors coupled with a silent majority frightened by the plans about introducing constitutional changes revolving around the Hindutva ideology made the people to cast their vote against Modi.

IT ISN’T THAT SIMPLE

Domestic factors and political compulsions aside, global economy and the desire to make India an economic power are also in play.

“As the US and Europe shift their immediate sourcing away from China, it is more effective to have Chinese companies invest in India and then export the products to these markets rather than importing from China, adding minimal value, and then re-exporting them,” said India’s Chief Economic Adviser V Anantha Nageswaran said in the annual economic survey.

To boost its global exports, Nageswaran said, New Delhi can either integrate into China’s supply chain or promote foreign direct investment (FDI) from China.

“Among these choices, focusing on FDI from China seems more promising for boosting India’s exports to the US, similar to how East Asian economies did in the past.”

The report said choosing the FDI strategy “appears more advantageous than relying on trade” as it can arrest the growing trade deficit New Delhi has with Beijing, the top exporter for India.

And this report triggered a debate that has seemingly resulted in this policy shift.

YES! WE NEED FDI

Soon after the report was tabled in Lok Sabha [India’s Lower House of Parliament], Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had backed her economic adviser.

She told a press conference that the adviser’s office works at an “arm’s distance” but “that doesn’t mean I am disowning the suggestion.” becoming the first minister to back such a move.

India tightened its scrutiny of investments from Chinese companies and halted major projects since 2020.

India’s net FDI inflow dropped by 62.17% to $10.58 billion in 2023-24, a 17-year-low, from $27.98 billion the previous year, official data showed.

Meanwhile, the Chinese investment will also help tackle the other challenge – Indian youth unemployment –  which is one of the biggest issues Modi is facing on domestic front.