Write For Us!

Opinions, Analysis, and Rebuttals.

A Global Digital Think-Tank on Policy Discourse.

Home Blog Page 29

Middle East On The Brink

0
Middle East

The conflict between Hamas and Israel has been ongoing for years, with sporadic bouts of violence and tensions. However, the ongoing escalation has raised grave concerns that it could spiral into a larger regional conflict.

The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran has further complicated the situation, as it is believed to be a retaliatory act by Israel. This has heightened tensions between Iran, a major supporter of Hamas, and Israel, which sees Iran as a regional threat.

The assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Iran represents a seismic shift in the dynamics of the Hamas-Israel war.

The Middle East is already a volatile region with various ongoing conflicts and proxy wars, and this recent development has the potential to ignite a larger-scale regional conflict involving other countries and factions.

The international community is closely watching the situation and urging both sides to exercise restraint and engage in peaceful dialogue to prevent further escalation.

The volatile mix of local grievances, international alliances, and historical tensions is threatening to engulf the entire region, raising fears of a broader war involving multiple states and non-state actors.

The current conflict between Hamas and Israel erupted in response to heightened tensions over Jerusalem and the West Bank, followed by Hamas launching a surprise barrage of rocket attacks against Israeli cities.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) retaliated with widespread airstrikes targeting Hamas strongholds in Gaza, leading to intense urban warfare and a devastating humanitarian crisis. The war has claimed thousands of lives, primarily among Palestinian civilians, and led to the destruction of vital infrastructure, hospitals, and schools in Gaza.

Iran’s strong backing of Hamas, through military and financial support, has been a crucial factor in extending the conflict.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia condemned Israel on Tuesday for targeting a makeshift displacement camp in Mawasi, Gaza. The Saudi Foreign Ministry issued a statement, describing the attack as “another violent assault on unarmed civilians by the Israeli war machine.”

The Kingdom firmly rejected what it referred to as ongoing “Israeli genocide” and urged an immediate ceasefire.

Saudi Arabia held Israeli forces fully responsible for violating international and humanitarian laws, emphasizing the global community’s legal, humanitarian, and moral duty to enforce accountability and halt Israel’s violations. The Kingdom called for activating international mechanisms to end these breaches of international law.

The strike, which hit a crowded tent camp in Gaza early Tuesday, left at least 19 people dead and 60 others wounded, according to Palestinian officials. The attack took place in Mawasi, an area designated by Israel as a humanitarian zone, sheltering displaced civilians from the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, which has now entered its second year.

As the conflict enters its most intense phase, the risk of it spilling beyond Israel’s borders is increasing. In southern Lebanon, Hezbollah—an Iranian-backed militant group—has exchanged fire with Israeli forces. At the same time, pro-Iranian militias in Iraq have vowed to join the fight if Hamas faces defeat. The involvement of these groups could open new fronts in the war, threatening to destabilize Lebanon and Iraq, both of which are already facing internal political crises.

Iran’s strong backing of Hamas, through military and financial support, has been a crucial factor in extending the conflict. Tehran sees Hamas as a key proxy in its wider strategy to challenge Israeli hegemony in the region and project its influence across the Middle East. As the war continues, Tehran’s involvement is likely to deepen, increasing the potential for confrontations between Israel and Iran.

Saudi Arabia condemned Israel on Tuesday for targeting a makeshift displacement camp in Mawasi, Gaza.

The assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Iran represents a seismic shift in the dynamics of the Hamas-Israel war. Haniyeh, a key figure in Hamas’s political and military strategy, was instrumental in forging strong ties with Tehran. His assassination is widely believed to be a covert operation, possibly conducted by Israel or a foreign intelligence agency, though no party has officially claimed responsibility.

Haniyeh’s killing has sent shockwaves throughout the region. In Gaza, Hamas leaders have vowed revenge, while Iran has condemned the assassination, labeling it an attack on its sovereignty. The loss of Haniyeh is a significant blow to Hamas’s leadership structure, but his death may also galvanize further support for the group’s cause. Iranian-backed militias across the Middle East are reportedly preparing for potential retaliation, targeting Israeli interests in the region.

If Iran retaliates directly or through its proxies in Lebanon, Syria, or Iraq, the conflict could escalate into a full-scale regional war. Hezbollah, already engaged in sporadic skirmishes with Israel along the southern Lebanon border, could launch a sustained offensive, dragging Israel into a multi-front war. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have hinted at a strong response, which could include missile attacks or cyber operations against Israeli or U.S. targets in the region.

The assassination of Haniyeh in Iran not only threatens to escalate the Hamas-Israel conflict but also risks triggering a broader regional war. The Middle East is a delicate geopolitical chessboard where even minor provocations can have far-reaching consequences. A major concern is the role of Iran’s network of allied militias.

In Iraq, groups such as Kata’ib Hezbollah have already signaled their willingness to engage in the fight against Israel. The Houthis in Yemen, who have regularly targeted Saudi Arabia with missile strikes, could also join the conflict, attacking Israeli or US assets in the region. These militias form a web of Iranian influence stretching from Lebanon to Iraq and Yemen, all of which could become battlefields if the situation spirals out of control.

The involvement of Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed militant group, could open new fronts in the war, threatening to destabilize Lebanon and Iraq.

The global ramifications of a broader conflict in the Middle East are profound. A war that involves Iran, Israel, and their respective allies would have a catastrophic impact on global energy supplies, as the region is home to some of the world’s largest oil reserves. An escalation in violence could disrupt oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, sending global energy prices skyrocketing and potentially triggering an economic crisis. Moreover, the conflict could exacerbate the refugee crisis in the region, with millions more displaced, straining neighboring countries and prompting international humanitarian responses.

International actors are scrambling to prevent the conflict from expanding. The United States, which has long been an ally of Israel, is urging restraint while simultaneously preparing to bolster Israel’s defense capabilities. Washington has warned Iran against any direct military action, but its leverage over Tehran is limited given the strained relations and recent withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal.

Russia and China, which have cultivated relationships with Iran, are calling for de-escalation while seeking to protect their interests in the region. Moscow, which maintains military bases in Syria and has vested interests in keeping the Assad regime in power, is particularly concerned about how an expanded war could jeopardize its foothold in the region.

The United Nations and European Union have issued urgent calls for a ceasefire, stressing the need for diplomatic solutions to the conflict. However, the deeply entrenched animosities between Israel, Hamas, and Iran, coupled with the broader geopolitical rivalries, make a diplomatic resolution seem increasingly unlikely in the short term.

The combination of the ongoing Hamas-Israel war, the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, and the involvement of regional powers has created a powder keg in the Middle East. The region is now on the cusp of a much larger conflict that could redraw alliances, shift power dynamics, and create widespread instability.

A war that involves Iran, Israel, and their respective allies would have a catastrophic impact on global energy supplies.

As Iran considers its response and Israel prepares for potential multi-front battles, the world watches anxiously, knowing that the consequences of a full-scale regional war would be devastating not only for the Middle East but for global stability as well.

In Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, there is growing apprehension about the possibility of a wider war.

Riyadh is in the midst of sensitive negotiations to normalize relations with Israel, an unprecedented diplomatic move that the escalating conflict could derail.

Saudi and Emirati leaders are now calling for restraint, wary of being dragged into a conflict that could destabilize the entire Arabian Peninsula.

Pakistan-India Super Normalization? Not So Fast

0
India and Pakistan

Peace activists in both India and Pakistan want their respective governments to resume talks and end the long bilateral deadlock without further procrastination. They strongly feel the present impasse is not only mutually harmful but also affecting the region as a whole. And unless the two largest countries in South Asia join hands, the region would remain stuck in wretchedness. To them, realizing national and regional prosperity has become hostage to seemingly intractable Pakistan-India hostility. They feel disappointed at the general nonchalance in the region towards addressing multiple and multidimensional challenges. In short, they find no justification for the two countries to live in perpetual animosity.

Their pursuit of peace is praiseworthy. But as far as I know, they have yet to come up with workable propositions. Expressing the desire for peace is not enough. It must be backed by building unignorable pressure on Islamabad and New Delhi. And that will happen only if they have a well thought-out, realistic plan of action in hand.

To them, realizing national and regional prosperity has become hostage to seemingly intractable Pakistan-India hostility.

In essence, activists on both sides of the border must understand that issues that continue to bedevil Pakistan-India relations are enormously complex. The fundamental question remains as to how to get the two countries engage in a process that seamlessly segues from conflict management to conflict resolution.

At the same time, is it reasonable to expect peace activists on both sides of the border to defenestrate their historical and national biases? Even if they genuinely believe in their admirable cause and try to be as impartial as possible, they are often snubbed by their fellow citizens and accused of mortgaging their patriotism and national loyalty. Such is the bilateral environment. Ergo, it is not surprising that peace activists have not been able to develop a groundswell of support on either side; traction to their cause remains minuscule at best.

As I look at the present situation, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. The two countries have tried almost all possible approaches towards normalizing their relations but to no big avail. India traditionally believed that addressing the difficult disputes such as Jammu and Kashmir would not be possible without first creating a conducive environment through a slew of confidence-building measures (CBMs) in less controversial areas including trade, culture and people-to-people contact. In the past, New Delhi would invariably demur to setting preconditions for negotiations.

Pakistan, however, would approach the bilateral relationship differently. Islamabad would usually hold the view that the Jammu and Kashmir was the core dispute. Once this was settled, normalization would follow on its own, enabling the two countries to also address the peripheral issues. Interestingly, the two countries would often even bicker over whether Jammu and Kashmir is an ‘issue’ or a ‘dispute’ as words are critical in ‘Diplomacy’ as in ‘Law’.

The two countries have tried almost all possible approaches towards normalizing their relations but to no big avail.

The Composite Dialogue framework that was put together in 1997, comprising eight components for talks, was the combination of the two approaches. It was the mechanism for both putting in place CBMs, and finding solutions to core issues related to peace and security including Jammu and Kashmir. The dialogue, however, could not begin as bilateral tensions soared following the Indian nuclear tests in May 1998. Par for the course, Pakistan responded with its own nuclear tests. The nuclear genie had finally come out of the bottle in South Asia.

Then, there was the Kargil conflict in the first half of 1999 which created more chasms with mutual distrust touching the nadir. It was the SAARC summit in Pakistan held in January 2004 that provided the opportunity to break the long logjam. President Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee met on the margins and agreed to give a chance to the Composite Dialogue.

As one looks back, the period between 2004 and 2008 was most peaceful as well as fruitful. Several CBMs were initiated including tourism and trade across the Line of Control (LoC). Dividends were visible as diplomacy was also working on the backchannel mandated to find a mutually palatable solution to the Jammu and Kashmir dispute. Peace activists could now relatively easily travel to each other across the border. “Aman ki Asha” (Hope for Peace) became the buzzword. However, India’s prevarication on Kashmir could not sustain the momentum of congeniality for long.

The November 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai brought almost everything back to square one. Accusations and counter-accusations vitiated the atmosphere yet again. “Aman ki Asha” did not take much time to dissipate, and the peace activists also sort of went into dormancy. There was some initial cooperation to bring the culprits of the Mumbai attack to justice but there are still some serious roadblocks to conclude the ongoing trial in Pakistan. I know for a fact that earnest cooperation from the Indian side has been lacking and, in my view, New Delhi is not very keen to put a closure to the trial as the Mumbai attack is a convenient talking point to keep hammering Islamabad on terrorism, and avoiding serious talks on Kashmir.

It is time for our Indian friends and peace activists to exert pressure on New Delhi to understand that Jammu and Kashmir is neither an integral part of India nor of Pakistan.

The election of Modi as prime minister did engender some hopes but those too could not last long, for Modi’s agenda was clear from the very beginning that he was not interested in talking to Pakistan on Kashmir. Yet the latter offered itself to be inveigled into believing otherwise. The July and December 2015 joint statements issued in Ufa and Islamabad, respectively were indubitably poorly negotiated statements from our side. Islamabad unilaterally and rather readily conceded too much ground on Kashmir.

The Pathankot attack on January 2, the arrest of Commander Kulbhushan Jhadav in March, the martyr of Burhan Wani in July, Modi’s remarks on Balochistan in August, the Uri attack in September and the cancellation of the scheduled SAARC summit in Islamabad in November made 2016 one of the most difficult years in Pakistan-India relations. As Pakistan’s high commissioner in New Delhi, it was disquieting for me to see the relationship going from bad to worse. Indeed, I was far more worried than the peace activists. In the end, diplomacy is not about fulfilling desires but about achieving policy objectives. This is what puts diplomats and peace activists at odds most of the time.

Even at present I see wide gaps between the two. Indian and Pakistani peace activists have reemerged with the message of “engagement” and “normalization”. The question is how. Should Pakistan accept what India did on August 5, 2019 in clear violation of its commitments to Kashmiris, Pakistan and the international community by illegally annexing the occupied Jammu and Kashmir? My worry is that Islamabad may be tempted to breaking the deadlock on Indian terms yet again.

There is no gainsaying that regional and global challenges from climate change to water crisis do warrant a thaw. But it is also true that effective regional cooperative frameworks cannot be built on rickety foundations of unpredictable and hostile bilateral relations.

It would be a huge diplomatic mistake on the part of Pakistan to revert to the bilateral engagement and negotiations under the Ufa and Islamabad joint statements. In any case, those lopsided documents were never workable, and have become totally irrelevant post-5 August 2019.

I am not doubting for a moment the intentions of peace activists. Nevertheless, they cannot deny the fact that this time the onus is on India to break the deadlock not only for resuming bilateral engagement but also normalizing relations irreversibly by settling the Jammu and Kashmir dispute.

It is time for our Indian friends and peace activists to exert pressure on New Delhi to understand that Jammu and Kashmir is neither an integral part of India nor of Pakistan. This is for Kashmiris to decide and please let them decide in an honorable manner. Otherwise, good-neighborly relations between India and Pakistan would continue moving from a stalemate to a stalemate.

Resuming trade, cricketing ties and cultural exchanges are all good stuff but, as a former diplomat, I would be careful to not fall for illusions.

Trump On Back Foot As Harris Targets Him Over False Claims

0
Donald Trump

PHILADELPHIA – Republican Donald Trump on Tuesday again refused to admit that he had lost the 2020 presidential election, as Democrat Vice President Kamala Harris attacked him over abortion issue, fitness for office and legal woes he is facing.

As expected, Trump during the presidential debate repeatedly sought to turn the conversation to the economy and immigration, as he narrated false stories about migrants stealing and eating people’s pets. However, the Republican candidate said he would not sign a federal abortion ban.

Meanwhile, online prediction market PredictIt’s 2024 presidential general election market showed Trump’s likelihood of victory declining during the debate, to 47% from 52%. Harris’ odds improved to 55% from 53%.

OUT OF CONTROL

Harris, 59, appeared to get under the former president’s skin repeatedly, prompting a visibly angry Trump, 78, to deliver a series of falsehood-filled retorts.

She criticized Trump over his criminal conviction for covering up hush money payments to a porn star as well as his other indictments and a civil judgment finding him liable for sexual assault.

At one point, she brought up Trump’s campaign rallies, goading him by saying that people often leave early “out of exhaustion and boredom.”

Trump, who has been frustrated by the size of Harris’ own crowds, said, “My rallies, we have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics.” He then pivoted to an unsubstantiated claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are “eating the pets” of residents.

Also read: Swing Voters To Decide US Presidential Election Amid A Tied Race

When ABC News moderator David Muir pointed out that city officials denied any evidence that migrants in Springfield were actually eating pets, Trump doubled down, saying “the people on television” were saying it. When pressed, Trump just said, “We’ll find out.”

The debate, hosted by ABC News, took place at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. As agreed by the campaigns, there was no live audience and candidates’ microphones were muted when it was not their turn to speak.

In a sign of confidence in the debate’s outcome, Harris’ campaign challenged Trump to a second debate immediately.

MARXIST HARRIS

Trump, who enjoys the support of billionaire Elon Musk, called Harris a “Marxist”. These terms associating the Democrats with communism had started surfacing when Barack Obama came into power for 2008 election. He was often labelled as a communist, ironically when his voters increasingly grew unhappy over not implementing the platform after assuming the office.

Hence, Musk is openly propagating the far right and has relaxed the restrictions on X to make spreading xenophobic ideas and hate speech easier.

When the debate moved to crime, Trump claimed that crime was up in the United States contrary to the rest of the world. There too Muir pointed out that, according to FBI data, crime had actually declined in the past few years.

RACISM

During the debate, Trump also not repeated his false claim that his 2020 election defeat was due to fraud, but also asserted the baseless assertion that migrants have caused a violent crime spree.

Trump was asked by the moderators about one of those attacks, when he told an event with Black journalists in July that Harris had recently “become a Black person.”

“I couldn’t care less,” he said. “Whatever she wants to be is OK with me.”

Also read: Freedom of Inciting Violence: Billionaires Shaping The World

Harris, who has both Black and South Asian heritage, responded, “I think it’s a tragedy that we have someone who wants to be president who has consistently over the course of his career attempted to use race to divide the American people.”

Harris also sought to tie Trump to Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint that proposes expanding executive power, eliminating environmental regulations and making it illegal to ship abortion pills across state lines, among other right-wing goals.

Trump retorted that he has “nothing to do” with Project 2025, though some of his advisers were involved in its creation.

ABORTION

Harris delivered a lengthy attack on abortion limits, speaking passionately about women denied emergency care and victims of incest unable to terminate their pregnancies due to statewide bans that have proliferated since the US Supreme Court eliminated a nationwide right in 2022. Three Trump appointees were in the majority of that ruling.

She also claimed Trump would support a national ban. Trump called that assertion untrue but declined to say explicitly that he would veto such a law.

Trump, who has sometimes struggled with messaging on abortion, said falsely that Harris and Democrats support infanticide, which – as ABC News moderator Linsey Davis noted – is illegal in every state.

HIGHER TARIFFS AND ECONOMY

Harris attacked Trump’s intention to impose high tariffs on foreign goods – a proposal she has likened to a sales tax on the middle class – while touting her plan to offer tax benefits to families and small businesses.

Trump criticized Harris for the persistent inflation during the Biden administration’s term, though he overstated the level of price increases. Inflation, he said, “has been a disaster for people, for the middle class, for every class.”

Sliding South Korea Birth Rate Prompts National Emergency

0
South Korea

In June, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol announced a “national demographic emergency”. With the nation’s population forecast to virtually half to about 26 million until the end of the century, the United Nations’ newest demographic estimate speaks to his concerns.

Though this builds on long-run trends, only now is South Korea creating a specific ministry for population strategy and planning. But lessons gained from population planning initiatives along China’s Yellow Sea reveal that South Korea lacks a complete strategy. The background of South Korea’s demographic crisis is decades of economic prosperity and long-term complacency.

 South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol announced a ‘national demographic emergency’

From the middle of the past century, South Korea saw one of the fastest drops in fertility among humans ever seen. The newest UN World Population Prospects 2024 shows that the average number of live births a woman has across her reproductive years — or the total fertility rate — dropped from over six in 1960 to 0.72 in 2023.

South Korea’s GDP-per-capita is predicted to surpass Japan this year, the country’s economic revolution was amazing; in the 1950s, its GDP-per- capita was around half of Ghana. South Korea appears to have neglected to monitor China’s long-run economic demography policy, meanwhile, while it was focused catching up to Japan.

But unlike either South Korea or Japan, population policies define policymaking in China. Mao Zedong encouraged high birth rates, which produced the worker explosion expected to change the global economy as well as the Chinese one. Deng Xiaoping instituted a one-child policy and put that population to use from the 1980s.

The newest UN World Population Prospects 2024 shows that the total fertility rate dropped from over six in 1960 to 0.72 in 2023.

Less often mentioned, however, was that Deng also kept strengthening China’s educational, scientific, and technological bases. From the 1980s mandatory basic education was legislated; in the 1990s, post-secondary education spaces were enlarged, thereby starting the flow of workers able to be more productive than Mao’s baby boomers.

Simultaneously, China realized its fate would be to become old before it became affluent, based on 1980s Renmin University demographer studies. China, therefore, maximized its low-wage worker surge from the 1980s to the early 2010s by means of investor incentives that would eventually generate a world-changing industrialization process.

Moreover, Chinese policymakers guaranteed the expected comparable future growth in retirees from the 2020s would be less likely to hinder its long-term economic program by limited pension and healthcare pledges.

South Korea appears to have neglected to monitor China’s long-run economic demography policy, while it was focused on catching up to Japan.

China’s population has already started to decline, but its planners—from the 1980s—opted a strategy that would allow demographic fluctuations within a larger long-term economic growth program. Furthermore, on that agenda is China’s foreign policy using the Belt and Road Initiative to seize the development possibilities of “younger” areas like Southeast Asia and Africa.

Far from just observing demographic trends at home, China’s planners have a generally comprehensive and cointegrated population and development strategy at home and overseas. South Korea doesn’t need a population ministry if China’s population planners are any guide. South Korea needs a ministry charged with long-term thinking and a viable long-term economic demographic transition plan.

Swing Voters To Decide US Presidential Election Amid A Tied Race

0
Donald Trump

WASHINGTON – As Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are getting ready for their first live debate before the US presidential election, Pew says the two rivals enjoy equal support at 49% among registered voters.

But another pollster Nate Silver last week had predicted an electoral college victory for Trump, meaning that he would be US president for second time.

The majority of popular votes does not count in the US presidential election, as the winner is decided on the basic of an electoral college, comprising presidential electors from all the 50 states.

It shouldn’t be a surprise as no Republican presidential candidate has won popular vote since 2004 when George W Bush retained the office for a second term. He bagged 50.73% votes against John Kerry who later served as US State Secretary under Barack Obama.

Read more: Preserve democracy, no room for political violence: Biden

It is widely predicted that the no Republican candidate would now ever get elected as a US president because of the demographic changes. The party mainly attracts White voters whose share in population is shrinking constantly.

The debate could make a huge difference as the performance of Harris and Trump may influence the undecided and infrequent voters amid the extreme polarization in the US.

It also means the number of swing voters is on a constant decline as most of the people have already taken a clear position. Previously, it wasn’t the case when a large a section of US society used to switch their affiliations after one of two election cycles. The Reagan Democrats, who made Republican Ronald Reagan the US president in 1980 by siding with him in the Rust Belt, are a great example.

The same group again influenced the results in 1984 and 1988.

Meanwhile, the allegations of Russian interference are in play yet again, as the issue has become a routine matter every time a Western democracy goes to polls.

ABORTION AND ECONOMY

According to Pew, “Trump’s key advantage is on the economy, which voters regard as the most important issue this year. A 55% majority of voters say they are very or somewhat confident in Trump to make good decisions about economic policy, compared with 45% who say that about Harris.”

“Harris’ lead over Trump on abortion is a near mirror image of Trump’s on the economy: 55% of voters have at least some confidence in Harris, while 44% express confidence in Trump.”

POLITICS OF ELECTORAL COLLEGE

The number of each state is decided on the basis of seats in the House of Representatives plus the number of senators. So, it is basically the House of Representatives members plus two, given that each state has equal representation in the US Senate just like any other House of the Parliament.

On the other hand, the election for House of Representatives, held after every two years resulting in midterm-elections for every president, is constituency-based. The number of seats for each US state is allocated on the basis of population, with the total fixed at 435.

It means a US state has at least three members of the Congress – two senators and one in House of Representatives – no matter that state [federating unit] is.

However, this electoral college system treats the large states like California and New York unfairly, as the election is decided by the electors notwithstanding the fact one of the candidates may win there with a wide margin. Thus, it hurts the Democrats who are in majority in developed urban centers both along the east and west coasts.

Thus, the Republicans are the beneficiaries of the electoral college, as the smaller states with a majority of White population play a key role in results. In fact, the Republicans are in majority in most of the US states.

WHO WILL PROPEL EITHER OF THE CANDIDATES?

It makes the battleground states most important factor in any US election. These are the which could potentially be won by either candidate.

The seven battleground states in 2024 are: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and North Carolina. It is the reason why both Kamala and Trump are focusing on them.

In connection, Trump is now is trying to win over the infrequent voters that the campaign sees as key to victory in the battleground state.

This target audience is called “low propensity” voters – the people who don’t show up every voting cycle and may even skip the presidential ballot every four years.

Why? Because the support base for the Republicans isn’t growing as explained above amid the tilt towards far right and the resultant focus on the White population.

A New York Times/Siena College survey underscored the opportunity for the Trump campaign with less reliable voters.

China Outflanks US In Muslim World

0
Saudi Arabia

Chinese Prime Minister Prime Minister Li Qiang is arriving in Saudi Arabia today on the first leg of his September 10-13 visit to the Gulf States. Later, he will fly the UAE to hold talks with the Emirati leadership in the UAE.

The invitation extended to Li by the two Middle East giants is indicative of China’s growing clout and proactive involvement in the heart of the Muslim world.

Earlier, in July 2024, China hosted 14 Palestinian factions in Beijing to bring about the biggest rapprochement in the history of the Palestine Revolution, since all the factions agreed on a future Government of National Unity.

In March 2024, China, speaking at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on Gaza genocide, fully supported the “right of armed resistance by a people living under occupation to foreign military occupation”, as being in line with international law. Hence, the Palestinian armed resistance against Israel was fully justified by the Chinese, which is a principled position that also applies to Occupied Kashmir. This follows the earlier historic rapprochement brokered by China between Iran and Saudi Arabia in March 2023. These significant developments demonstrate the emergence of China as a proactive political player in the Middle East, which was earlier a predominantly ‘American domain’.

Pakistan has indirectly and directly contributed to this enhanced Chinese role in the Muslim World. It was in March 2022 that Foreign Minister Wang Yi was invited to address the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Conference of Foreign Ministers in Islamabad which was an historic first for China. During his speech on March 22, Wang talked about the “long standing relationship between China and the Muslim world” and reaffirmed that Beijing would continue supporting the Muslim countries in their quest for political independence and economic development.

This follows the earlier historic rapprochement brokered by China between Iran and Saudi Arabia in March 2023.

Historically, China has always been etched in the Muslim consciousness as a country with a great civilization based on knowledge, learning and development.  For example, there is a famous saying of the Holy Prophet Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him), 1400 years ago, which urged the Muslims to “seek knowledge, even if you have to go to China”, implying that although China was physically far away from Arabia, but it was a land of learning.  Soon after the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, a professor of the prestigious American Harvard University, Samuel Huntington, talked of a ‘clash of civilizations’ in which he suggested that the Western civilization would be at odds with both the Islamic and the Confucian civilizations.  Interestingly, he also talked of a united front of the Islamic and Confucian civilizations.

In his speech at the conference on “Dialogue among Civilizations” held in Beijing in May 2019, President Xi Jinping mentioned the contribution of the Islamic civilization to “enrich the Chinese civilization” and also referred to the Holy Mosque in Makkah as well as the travels to China of the Muslim explorer, Ibn Batuta, who wrote favorably on China and the Chinese people.

China has a long-standing relationship with the Muslim world. After the Chinese Revolution in 1949, Pakistan was the first country in the Muslim world to recognize the People’s Republic of China in May 1950.  The first institutional interaction between China and the Muslim countries took place at the 1955 Afro-Asian Summit in Bandung, Indonesia.  It was hosted by the world’s largest Muslim country, Indonesia. Pakistan and China were among the countries attending this historic summit.  China shares its borders with 14 countries, five of which are members of the OIC and none of these have border disputes with China.

In January 1965, when the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was formed, China was among the first countries to recognize it.  And in the 1960s and early 1970s, China also provided material support and aid to various Muslim nations that were facing economic and political pressures. It included Pakistan, Nigeria, Indonesia, South Yemen and Egypt.

In January 1965, when the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was formed, China was among the first countries to recognize it. 

As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China also has been in the forefront of countries that have a proactive approach to the Muslim world.  Beijing, for example, presented a Middle East peace plan, which was unveiled when President of the Palestine Authority Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu during their visits to China in May 2013.

During his meeting with the two leaders, Xi presented the four-point peace plan that envisaged an independent Palestine State alongside Israel, based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.  While recognizing Israel’s right to exist, the document called for an end to building Jewish settlements in the occupied territories of Palestine, cessation of violence against civilians and termination of Israel’s blockade of Gaza.  It also suggested resolving the issue of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails and sought more humanitarian assistance while underlining that these are “necessary for the resumption of peace talks between Israel and Palestinian Authority”.

At the same time, Beijing also has been principled on the issue of Syria, urging an end to both interference in Syrian affairs and the civil war.  In January 2022, China invited Syria to be part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

China and Saudi Arabia are engaged in discussions to have their oil trade done partially in Chinese yuan.

China today is the largest importer of crude oil in the world and almost 50% of its supply comes from the Muslim countries of the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia, Iran and UAE.

Saudi Arabia also invited Xi to visit the Kingdom in November 2022, where he received a red-carpet welcome in marked contrast to the cold reception accorded to President Biden in July 2022. And there have been media reports that China and Saudi Arabia are engaged in discussions to have their oil trade done partially in Chinese yuan – also known as RMB.

Defense cooperation between China and the Muslim world is also expanding, as Chinese advanced jetfighter J10C is now in use in countries like Pakistan and the UAE.  In January 2022, China and Iran signed a comprehensive “Strategic Accord” which will run for 25 years, worth well over $400 billion.

Meanwhile, the centerpiece of China’s relationship with the Muslim world today is the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Interestingly, the BRI was launched in two phases by Xi, with two important speeches in two different Muslim countries. In September 2013, during the speech in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, he announced the launch of the Silk Road Economic Belt, and in Jakarta, the Indonesian capital, he revealed the Maritime Silk Road – the two pillars of the BRI.

At the OIC conference on March 22, Wang said that “China is investing over 400 billion dollars in nearly 600 projects across the Muslim world under the BRI.” He underlined that “China is ready to work with the Islamic countries to promote a multi-polar world, democracy in international relations and diversity of human civilization, and make unremitting efforts to build a community with a shared future for mankind”. And on the issue of Palestine and Kashmir, Wang said that “China shares the same aspirations as the OIC seeking a comprehensive and just settlement of these disputes”.

Another example of close ties between China and the Muslim world, was the February 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics where a majority of Muslim countries like Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar had high-level representation, despite the boycott called by certain Western nations.  And on March 30, 2022, China hosted an important conference of neighboring countries of Afghanistan which was well attended.

There is a shift in the global balance of economic and political power away from West to the East.

China has also received support from Muslim countries on the issue of Xinjiang at the UN Human Rights Council.  In fact, in July 2019, when a group of 22 nations led by the West sent a letter to the UN Human Rights Council criticizing China on Xinjiang, not a single Muslim country was a signatory, while another 37 countries submitted a letter on the same issue defending Chinese policies.  These countries included all the six Gulf countries plus Pakistan, Algeria, Syria, Egypt, Eritrea, Nigeria, Somalia and Sudan.

Given the changing geopolitical scenario, where there is a shift in the global balance of economic and political power away from West to the East, followed by US efforts for a New Cold War to ‘contain’ China, the thrust for cooperation and connectivity has a broad resonance in the Muslim world. The Muslim countries see their relations with China as a strategic bond to promote both stability and security and economic development and the BRI has become the principal vehicle in the promotion of such an approach.

In the coming years, China’s partnership with the Muslim world is likely to be strengthened given the mutuality of interests and the convergence of worldviews in upholding a world order based on international law, the UN Charter and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. This is in keeping with the resurgence of the Global South, which was evident in China hosting a summit of 50+ African leaders in Beijing, a diplomatic feat unmatched by any other non-African country. All Muslim African countries participated in the Beijing Summit. Basically, in the context of the New Cold War unleashed by the US, China is successful in outflanking the US in an area that Washington once considered its ‘domain’, which is now no more the case.

Address The Bullies Before They Become Frankensteins

0
PTI

It seems the PTI isn’t ready to shun the politics of violence and intimidation as the party leadership on Sunday again used threats as a medium to spread their message.

Ali Amin Gandapur, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister, yet again led the charge and threatened to get the incarcerated party founder, Imran Khan, released from the Adiala jail by force, if he isn’t set free within 15 days.

He also talked about invading Punjab by leading thousands from his home province and used derogatory language against Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz.

But the most alarming aspect, which shouldn’t be forgotten, is that Gandapur is the person who has defended the Afghan Taliban and justified terrorist attacks carried out in Pakistan. are critical of the PTI while warning them of serious consequences.

If some people still believe that Imran and his followers stand for democracy and democratic ideals revolving around personal freedoms, then nothing can be done to awaken them.

Some people suggest that the PTI follows the dual policy of begging behind the scene and giving a strong message in public just to keep the support base intact. However, this viewpoint is flawed: it is part of the larger organized campaign designed for inciting violence and fuel sentiments against national institutions.

Even if this dual policy argument is accepted as a justified political line of action, the second part – incitement to violence – is fully achieved, which cannot be ignored by only political correctness.

The use of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government resources for this rally represents a trend – the PTI believes in achieving its goals by hook or crook. It also coincides with the military trial of Lt-Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed, a development that is showing a clear link between the former ISI chief and the PTI founding chairman.

Also read: DG ISPR Doesn’t Rule Out Military Trial Of Imran

So, the threats are clearly aimed at playing the victim card and threatening the state officials simultaneously so that the law doesn’t take its course against Imran.

As far as the Afghanistan and the Taliban are concerned, Imran and his party are known for having a soft corner for the terrorist organizations like the TTP, with many even suggesting that the PTI has become their political front.

It is the PTI founder who proudly admitted allowing the resettlement of thousands of TTP members after years of advocacy in favor of opening their offices in Pakistan.

Also read: Afghan Taliban, Al Qaeda Asked For FATA Revival. Imran Said Yes

But now it has been revealed that Imran and Faiz had agreed to the demand made by the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda to reverse the FATA merger. The sole reason was to make the erstwhile tribal region a safe haven for global terrorist outfits.

This reliance on TTP for politics is the most serious threat to Pakistan’s national security, as this approach combines terrorism and politics, which is a negation of the very concepts of state and democracy.

Meanwhile, Imran’s strategy also explains why he has spent decades religiously on mainstreaming the ideas like jihad and jirga system.

With the Pakhtun and Afghan nationalism being hijacked by the Taliban, the terrorists through their facilitators and a rising number of sympathizers now can influence minds and politics on the both sides of the border.

Against all the predictions and hopes shared by a large number of well-meaning circles, the PTI isn’t behaving like a political party. The PTI’s journey is again a proof that evolution does not mean inaction and future isn’t always bright if we miss the opportunity to take right actions at the right time.

Hoping that a slice of power will automatically civilize thuggish behavior is flawed. It has never worked and will never work. Appeasement of bullies only emboldens them. It is about time the thinking heads huddle together by involving the parliament and take the threat heads on before it becomes a real Frankenstein.

Russian Interference Yet Again As Elon Musk Promotes Far Right

0
Elon Musk

NEW YORK – Elon Musk is known for promoting far-right on X, his social media platform, while portraying him himself as the champion of free speech.

He bought Twitter in April 2022 and later renamed it as X. Since then, the content restrictions have been eased, making it easier for White nationalists and others to propagate their ideas freely.

Despite a backlash from governments, Musk isn’t ready to change his stance. Some media reports suggests that he is seeking a role in the future Donald Trump government and thus backing him openly against Kamal Harris in the US presidential election.

Certainly, Musk has massive economic interests to protect – from Tesla to Starlink and SpaceX.

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE

His political ambitions coincide with the Russian interference in the US elections, a never-ending episode which started with Trump’s decision to jump into political arena, as he contested the 2016 presidential election successfully.

Earlier this week, the US Justice Department in New York filed money-laundering charges against two employees of Russian state media network RT. They are facing the charges related to influencing the 2024 presidential election.

They are accused of using used shell companies and fake personas to pay $10 million to an unnamed Tennessee company to produce online videos aimed at amplifying political divisions in the United States.

Although the company is not named in the indictment, details provided in court filings match up with Tenet Media, a Nashville-based company that has posted nearly 2,000 videos to YouTube in less than a year.

Meanwhile, this story reminds us of what we are currently experiencing in Pakistan, as social media employed to create divisions in the country by attacking the national institutions.

YOUTUBE SHUTS DOWN CHANNELS

Just a day after the indictment, YouTube announced terminating the Tenet Media channel and four channels operated by Tenet owner Lauren Chen.

THE MUSK CONNECTION

Unlike YouTube, there are no chances of X going after such elements, as Musk has not only been promoting similar ideas but also interacting with them on the social media platform.

Also read: Freedom of Inciting Violence: Billionaires Shaping The World

Tenet Media is linked to far-right influencers Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, and Benny Johnson, who regularly engage with Musk on X.

These influencers have over six million followers. Despite their involvement with Tenet, none of them have been accused of wrongdoing, and they claim they were unaware of the company’s Russian funding.

The indictment detailed that one influencer working with Tenet earned $400,000 monthly and a $100,000 bonus to create four weekly videos.

But Musk isn’t restricting his “activism” to just the United States, as he predicted civil war in the UK during the recent anti-immigrant riots. His comments drew reaction from the British government, forcing him to delete the said post. However, he still continues to back the far-right ideals across the world.

Brazil is another example where the country’s top court banned X after Musk refused to comply with the orders to block the accounts responsible for hate speech.

SCO: Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner

0
SCO Summit

ISLAMABAD – Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi can pull a surprise by attending the Shanghai Cooperation Council (SCO) Summit scheduled to be held in Islamabad next month, said Murtaza Solangi.

He expressed these views in “The Weekend”, a weekly program which is joint production of the Stratheia and WE News. It is jointly hosted by Muhammad Ali with the weekly episode uploaded on YouTube every Saturday.

Solangi was responding to a question raised by Ali about the prospects of Modi accepting the invitation extended by Pakistan.

The two-day SCO Summit would be held in Islamabad on Oct 15 and 16. Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang is also among those attending event. He will arrive in the capital on Oct 14, which is the first visit by the Chinese prime minister in 11 years.

Solangi said he could not rule out the possibility. “Modi is Modi. He can do anything,” he remarked and recalled the even the Indian high commissioner didn’t know about the visit when Modi suddenly reached Lahore to meet the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif at his Jati Umra residence on Dec 15, 2015.

DIPLOMATIC MASTERSTROKE

Both Solangi and Ali agreed that the invitation represents shrewd diplomacy on the part of Pakistan.

“Inviting Modi is a gritty diplomatic move,” he said, showing that “we are not an abnormal state”.

The reasoning behind the invitation is the fact that the SCO is a multilateral organization and the approach adopted by Islamabad shows it knows how to deal with the international affairs.

It is worth recalling that the SCO 2023 Summit – formally called SCO Heads of State Council Meeting – on July 4 in India was a videoconference as Modi decided not to host the then prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the Chinese leadership.

Earlier, the SCO Council of Foreign Ministers Meeting was held in Goa in May 2023. Pakistan at that time too showed maturity and sent the then foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari to attend the event.

That’s why Bilawal had stolen the show as the entire media was focused on him.

IMRAN, FAIZ AND MILITARY COURT

Solangi mentioned that the ISPR director general in his last press conference had not ruled out the possibility of Imran facing trial under the Army Act. However, he would have an open trial in case he was found to be a co-accused as former ISI chief Lt-Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed was also going through the court-martial process, he said.

Ali recalled that Imran and his party had been changing their stance on Faiz who was first declared an asset. But later, he said, it was listed as an internal matter of Pakistan Army. However, they were currently shying away from even discussing the matter, Ali remarked.

They were trying to protect themselves from the fallout, Solangi noted.

PTI RALLY WON’T PRODUCE ANYTHING 

The PTI rally is again ready to organize a rally in Islamabad on Sunday after cancelling the plan several times. When asked whether Imran’s party is going to invade the federal capital, Solangi predicted that it won’t happen as they were part of the system.

About the possible demands, he said there would be tough talk only. However, he added, law should take its course if there were any criminal cases against the party leaders. Focusing on street politics instead of the parliament had hurt the PTI, he added.

AMENDMENTS IN ATA

Media is now abuzz with the proposed amendments in the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) which are meant for empowering the security forces with the growing threat of terrorist activities in Balochistan.

“It is an extraordinary situation, especially in Balochistan,” Solangi said. “Extraordinary situation warrants extraordinary measures.”

As the proposed changes will help dealing with the missing persons issue, he said it would be sunset clause, not permanent feature.

A sunset clause is a measure within a legislation which provides for the law to cease to be effective after a specified date. It cannot be extended without further legislative action.

However, Solangi noted that the government was taking other remedial steps too to tackle the challenge in Balochistan. “It is not just coercive measures.”

DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL MEDIA

According to Solangi, some polls suggest that Kamala Harris has better chances of winning against Donald Trump in the US presidential election.

Many believe that social media has a become a threat to democracy, he said and mentioned that Elon Musk joining any future Trump government would not be a good development. It was going to ensure concentration of powers and thus monopoly instead of decentralization, he noted.

Global Warming: Summer 2024 Was Hottest On Record

0
Global Warming

BRUSSELS/ISLAMABAD – As Pakistan has been witnessing the devastating effects of global warming, 2024 saw the summer being warmest on record.

According to the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), the June to August period this year surpassed the record set in 2023, as it calculated the data for the northern hemisphere.

The C3S is the European Union’s climate change monitoring service which shared the findings in its monthly bulletin.

It is now likely that 2024 will outrank 2023 as the planet’s warmest on record, after human-driven climate change and El Nino combined together earlier this year to fuel the process of rising temperatures.

“During the past three months of 2024, the globe has experienced the hottest June and August, the hottest day on record, and the hottest boreal summer on record,” said C3S deputy director Samantha Burgess.

Unless countries urgently reduce their planet-heating emissions, extreme weather “will only become more intense”, she said. Greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels are the main cause of climate change.

SOUTH ASIA AND WATER SCARCITY

Earlier, scientists in different reports have warned repeatedly that South Asia is among the worst-affected regions. The global warming effects are very visible in the rapid melting of glaciers in the Himalayas, Karakorum and Hindukush mountains.

The alarming developments are exacerbated by the fact that South Asia has been witnessing reduction in annual rainfall and snowfall. With rainy seasons [both winter and monsoon] getting erratic, it means water scarcity is certainly the biggest challenge to a region which is home to over 1.6 billion people.

So, one shouldn’t be surprised that ensuring food security should be a priority for Pakistan and other South Asian countries. The reason is simple: the traditional crop pattern cannot withstand the changes in weather pattern produced by global warming.

EXTREME WEATHER

Rising temperatures have various effects. It can lead to heatwaves and droughts in some regions while increasing intensity of rains in others. In fact, the same region may experience drought followed by floods caused by heavy rains.

The 2022 floods during 2022 monsoon season are a stark reminder for Pakistan. It wasn’t riverine flooding; these floods were caused by torrential rains in Sindh, Balochistan and parts of southern Punjab caused by multiple monsoon systems coming from the east.

In short, the local topography could not sustain the rains or the amount of water, thus the rainwater inundating the region.

On the other hand, the region comprising northeastern and upper Punjab, Kashmir and upper Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan is known as monsoon belt, where annual rainfall has reduced significantly during the past 40 years.