There was a shocking absence of substantive public interest discussion during the 2024 US presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. However, it became evident in this particular debate that instead of focusing on the critical issues facing the country, the two contenders resorted to political maneuvering and personal attacks in an effort to assign blame. Foreign policy, economic woes, and domestic concerns like healthcare, education, and infrastructure were noticeably absent from the conversation. Instead of providing a clear strategy to address the challenges America faces, the discussion revolved around accusations, pointing fingers, and attacking characters.
A more pessimistic and hostile tone in American political discourse raises concerns about the state of democracy in the country. The United States has long been an advocate for open political discourse, civic engagement, and democratic ideals, earning the reputation as the world’s most democratic nation. However, considering how these principles are undermined throughout this debate, it raises the question of whether American democracy continues to be the global model it formerly was. The credibility of the voting process is undermined and the important talks that voters need to hear in order to make informed decisions are sidelined when attacks on individuals are prioritized above criticism of policies.
A more pessimistic and hostile tone in American political discourse raises concerns about the state of democracy in the country.
Nonetheless, the disparity was glaring when compared with previous US presidential debates. What was once a platform for candidates to lay out their plans for the country’s future is now more akin to the negative spectacle associated with political wrangling in developing nations. It is rather alarming how political debate is erasing public interest from front stage. This argument ultimately reflects a more general degradation in the ideals that once distinguished American democracy. The conversation between Trump and Harris’s tone and substance do not inspire faith in the state of US democratic norms.
Electing a president depends much on public choice and merit as the American people consider the performance of the present government and the qualifications of the contenders. Regarding the Biden administration, a lot of difficulties have surfaced both locally and internationally. Often seen as a disaster, the Afghanistan pullout had a long-lasting effect on US foreign policies. Biden oversaw the humanitarian situation in Gaza, rising tensions with China, and the continuous Ukraine conflict. Concerns about America’s diminishing global power also stem from the worldwide movement toward de-dollarization and BRICS growth.
Americans have struggled greatly domestically as well. Many people feel insecure from unemployment, inflation, economic instability, growing incidence of bigotry and violence. Based on their performance over the last four years, these elements have resulted in a rising belief that the Democrats would find it difficult to win the next presidential contest.
Many people feel insecure from unemployment, inflation, economic instability, growing incidence of bigotry and violence.
Though she brought diversity, female, non-White candidate connected to the Obama and Biden administrations, Harris was not first positioned to head the Democratic ticket. Her candidature arose because President Biden resigned during the first debate with Trump, therefore providing Harris with an unexpected path. Though symbolic, her candidacy may not be sufficient to help the Democrats overcome their difficulties.
Conversely, the Republican rival Trump likewise has a lot of issues and flaws. Nevertheless, the erratic character of politics makes the result still unknown. The American people will ultimately have to make the decision on who they think would be most qualified to guide the nation through these stormy years.
The people will assess the contenders according on their history, future vision, capacity to handle urgent problems both locally and internationally. Public opinion may change quickly as usual in politics, so the ultimate choice one that only the people can decide.
Particularly at a period of unfriendly, turbulent, and severe geopolitics, the world expectations from the American presidential elections are noteworthy. In a scene where economic progress, expansion, and prosperity are much required, the globe is seeking a leader who can provide peace, stability, and assurance. An ideal American president is supposed to promote international collaboration, friendly relations with other countries, and help to turn the planet into a better, more habitable environment.
An ideal American president is supposed to promote international collaboration, friendly relations with other countries, and help to turn the planet into a better, more habitable environment.
Hoping that conflicts and disagreements would be settled peacefully inside the framework of the United Nations Charter, the world community wants the end of continuous wars and confrontations. Additionally, highly anticipated are free and fair trade policies that help everyone and solve world problems like poverty, natural catastrophes, climate change, education, and healthcare.
Without any kind of empire, superiority, or compulsion, nations all over seek equitable treatment. Regardless of a nation’s size, wealth, or strength, they demand respect of national sovereignty. Many feel the next US president should maintain justice, impartiality, and law-based administration as they guarantee the fair treatment of all nations. The world community essentially wants for a president who can encourage peace, mutual respect, and cooperation by means of interpersonal interactions, therefore fostering a better and more equitable global order.
