The 21st century has indeed been one of converging globalizes, technological advances, and transnational quandaries which no single nation state can handle. These challenge of climate change and pandemics, financial crisis, as well as geopolitical instability need a coordinated global response. Thus, global governance acts as an important instrument in managing and ameliorating such challenges efficiently.

Global challenges like climate change, pandemics, and economic crises demand strong global governance, yet existing structures remain flawed and imbalanced.

It is a web of institutions, international arrangement of policies and cooperative frameworks across national borders to collaborate and help ensure mutual order and sustainable development. Although we need global governance; it is filled with complexity, power fights, and criticisms over whether it should exist and, if it does, if works and legitimate.

The concept of global governance is not new; yet, it has taken hundreds of years to develop over different types of cooperation and institutional development. The sovereignty and non-intervention, it would later emphasize were forged in 1648 with the Treaty of Westphalia. But things started to change when global interactions picked up, especially in the 19th and 20th centuries when such coordination appeared to be more required. After World War I, the attempt to establish international rules took the form of the League of Nations, an attempt that largely failed and with it the attempt to prevent another world war.

Founded after World War II in 1945 as a means to promote peace, security and development, the United Nations (UN), comprising a multilateral effort, is not a recent organization by any means. A number of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and World Trade Organization (WTO) came into existence to regulate economic and financial affairs alongside the UN.

Governance structures that enable states to cooperate within regional situations and include the European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU), are also regional bodies. The increasing pace of globalization has resulted in governance beyond established state actors to cover other actors, that is, non-state actors such as multinational corporations (MNCs), non-government organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups.

Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges today and no political boundaries matter in a phenomenon that needs a global response. Under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Paris Agreement is adopted in 2015 to serve as a cooperative effort in which countries commit to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, commitments are voluntary in nature and challenge the efficacious implementation of such commitments due to inequality in economic capabilities among nations. Frequently, the lack of binding enforcement mechanisms that promote compliance results in non-compliance and hence, amounts to collective efforts to reduce environmental degradation.

Similarly, global health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlight the significance of robust global governance. The World Health Organization (WHO) is central to the coordination of responses, dissemination of information, and advisory to governments regarding the global flu pandemic. Nevertheless, the pandemic revealed structural weaknesses, such as the insufficient funding, the political intervention and the gradual spilling out of vaccines to developing countries. This, in some ways, highlights these shortcomings and shows the need to have reform of global health governance on equity, transparency and rapid response mechanisms.

The UN, IMF, and WTO play vital roles, but their decision-making remains dominated by powerful nations, limiting fairness and representation.

There is a second critical component where international cooperation is essential; that is, economic governance. The global financial crisis in 2008 showed how national economies are intertwined and have to work together to avoid collapses on the system level. The IMF and the World Bank give financial help and policy advice, although sometimes they are accused of imposing very rigid conditions on a nation that borrows money from them, leading thereby to further aggravation of social inequalities. It is of still crucial importance to reform these institutions so that emerging economies and developing countries will be fairly represented as a way to bolster the stability of the global economy.

Although important, it suffers from major weaknesses of power, institutional spurs, and legitimacy. The main critique addresses the leading role of the powerful states in the decision making processes. For instance, the organization of the UN Security Council, which, for instance, consists of five permanent members (United States, China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom), who have disproportionate power through a veto power, is often criticized. This is an arrangement that can cause deadlocks and thus prevent the decisions to take a decisive action on issues like Ukrainian and Syrian conflicts.

In addition, global governance mechanisms do not effective often engage in enforcement. Although at the international level no national government can law and impose the penalties that it can at home, international institutions must rely on voluntary compliance and diplomatic pressure. This is evident in trade agreements, environmental treaties and human rights conventions that will go unheeded since there is no global over-watch.

The second is the democratic deficit in global governance. And many of them operate in a kind of limbo of low transparency and lack of direct accountability to the global populace. Elites tend to dominate decision making processes and marginalized peoples as well as small nations are excluded from taking meaningful part in discussion. Thus, these institutions are often challenged upon their legitimacy and people call for greater inclusivity and representational equity.

With further integration of the world, the need for efficient global governance becomes greater and greater. Yet, to realize it, governance structures ought to be modified to take into account contemporary realities and to adopt more inclusive, transparent and efficient mechanisms. Multilateralism needs to be strengthened as it is a basic requirement for connecting states, international organizations and non-state actors in order to deal with outstanding global challenges.

Another possible avenue for improvement involves reforming institutions that already have failed so as to reflect changes in the modern geopolitical landscape. Powers such as building the UN Security Council to emerge, modifying the World Bank and IMF to let developing countries to have more voice, and strengthening the role of regional organizations can also play a role in more balanced and equitable global governance.

Furthermore, technological advancement opens doors and opportunities and challenges to governance as well. Because Digital governance, cybersecurity and data privacy are required to have some international regulatory model that allows innovation to flourish and prevent abuse. As artificial intelligence (AI) and automation gain importance in governance, ethical standards and unifying policy recommendations at the global level are needed to leverage the opportunities and to minimize the risks of algorithmic biases, surveillance and job displacement.

Without enforcement mechanisms, treaties and agreements often fail to achieve their intended impact, undermining global cooperation efforts.

It is also important for civil society to play a much more important role in governance. NGOs, grassroots movements, and social enterprises have become leverages for the voices of the peoples and hip to recruitment for human rights, environmental sustainability and social justice. Increased civil society input into global decision making processes can help to legitimize and make more responsive, to concerns of the public, global decision-making processes.

In an interconnected world, hundreds of challenges face humanity and an indispensable framework for meeting them is global governance. The need for effective global cooperation was well high to meet the challenge ranging from climate change and pandemics to economic instability and security threats. Although there are as yet no effective structures of global governance, the existing arrangements, that is, power imbalances, lack of enforcement mechanisms, and democratic deficits, would make any sort of global governance arrangements difficult to achieve or implement.

Thus, the required reforms to enhance more inclusive, accountable and flexible governance institutions to overcome these challenges. In the journey of humanity through the 21st century, synthesizing a fairer and more functional global governance system still needs to be achieved in an attempt to facilitate peace, prosperity, and sustainability on a global level.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. They do not represent the views, beliefs, or policies of the Stratheia.

Author

  • Prof. Andrea Francioni

    is a member of the Association for Asian Studies (Ann Arbor), of The author is a member of the Association of Extra-European Studies (Pisa) and of the Italian Society of International History (Padua). His current research interests include the foreign policy of the People's Republic of China and Western imperialism in China of the last Qing.

    View all posts